Introduction
French Toponymy and the Historical Geography of the Australian Coast
More than 670 French place names were assigned along the Australian coast as a result of the d’Entrecasteaux expedition (1791–1794) and the Baudin expedition (1800–1804). Today, around 360 of these names still appear on Australian maps.
Both voyages were official expeditions, authorised and funded by the French authorities. The d’Entrecasteaux expedition was approved in 1791 by the National Assembly and organised under the authority of the Ministry of the Navy; Baudin’s expedition was prepared under the Consulate with the involvement of the Ministry of the Navy and the Institut national. Both were equipped with state vessels and included naval officers, hydrographers and scientists assigned specific tasks before departure.
They took place at a time when European knowledge of the coasts of New Holland — present-day Australia — was still incomplete. Long stretches of coastline remained unknown to Europeans, while others had been only briefly examined and were represented imprecisely on maps and in atlases.
Hydrographers and the officers responsible for the surveys recorded the forms of the coastline — capes, bays, peninsulas, islands, islets and cliffs — while astronomical observations helped to determine their positions so that they could be plotted accurately on charts. The scientists studied the flora and fauna, the nature of the soils and the geology of the shores; naval officers handled navigation, examined the coasts, searched for secure anchorages and identified bays, passages and harbours capable of sheltering the ships.
In the course of this work of coastal reconnaissance and charting, place names were generally assigned as the coast was surveyed, under the authority of the commander. The Baudin expedition constitutes a remarkable exception: after Baudin’s death, much of his nomenclature was replaced by Péron and Freycinet with names selected after the voyage, with no direct connection to the circumstances of navigation or coastal survey.
The two expeditions therefore produced very different systems of nomenclature. The names assigned during d’Entrecasteaux’s voyage were closely connected with the circumstances of exploration and coastal reconnaissance. Those retained after the Baudin expedition resulted from a different process: selected largely after the return to France, they drew more heavily on the political, scientific and cultural setting of Napoleonic France than on the circumstances of geographical exploration itself.